TY - JOUR
T1 - A structured approach to detecting and treating depression in primary care
T2 - VitalSign6 project
AU - Jha, Manish K.
AU - Grannemann, Bruce D.
AU - Trombello, Joseph M.
AU - Clark, E. Will
AU - Eidelman, Sara Levinson
AU - Lawson, Tiffany
AU - Greer, Tracy L.
AU - Rush, A. John
AU - Trivedi, Madhukar H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Annals of Family Medicine, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2019/7/1
Y1 - 2019/7/1
N2 - PURPOSE This report describes outcomes of an ongoing quality-improvement project (VitalSign6) in a large US metropolitan area to improve recognition, treatment, and outcomes of depressed patients in 16 primary care clinics (6 charity clinics, 6 federally qualified health care centers, 2 private clinics serving lowincome populations, and 2 private clinics serving patients with either Medicare or private insurance). METHODS Inclusion in this retrospective analysis was restricted to the first 25,000 patients (aged =12 years) screened with the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) in the aforementioned quality-improvement project. Further evaluations with self-reports and clinician assessments were recorded for those with positive screen (PHQ-2 >2). Data collected from August 2014 though November 2016 were available at 3 levels: (1) initial PHQ-2 (n = 25,000), (2) positive screen (n = 4,325), and (3) clinician-diagnosed depressive disorder with 18 or more weeks of enrollment (n = 2,160). RESULTS Overall, 17.3% (4,325/25,000) of patients screened positive for depression. Of positive screens, 56.1% (2,426/4,325) had clinician-diagnosed depressive disorder. Of those enrolled for 18 or more weeks, 64.8% were started on measurement- based pharmacotherapy and 8.9% referred externally. Of the 1,400 patients started on pharmacotherapy, 45.5%, 30.2%, 12.6%, and 11.6% had 0, 1, 2, and 3 or more follow-up visits, respectively. Remission rates were 20.3% (86/423), 31.6% (56/177), and 41.7% (68/163) for those with 1, 2, and 3 or more follow-up visits, respectively. Baseline characteristics associated with higher attrition were: non-white, positive drug-abuse screen, lower depression/anxiety symptom severity, and younger age. CONCLUSION Although remission rates are high in those with 3 or more followup visits after routine screening and treatment of depression, attrition from care is a significant issue adversely affecting outcomes.
AB - PURPOSE This report describes outcomes of an ongoing quality-improvement project (VitalSign6) in a large US metropolitan area to improve recognition, treatment, and outcomes of depressed patients in 16 primary care clinics (6 charity clinics, 6 federally qualified health care centers, 2 private clinics serving lowincome populations, and 2 private clinics serving patients with either Medicare or private insurance). METHODS Inclusion in this retrospective analysis was restricted to the first 25,000 patients (aged =12 years) screened with the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) in the aforementioned quality-improvement project. Further evaluations with self-reports and clinician assessments were recorded for those with positive screen (PHQ-2 >2). Data collected from August 2014 though November 2016 were available at 3 levels: (1) initial PHQ-2 (n = 25,000), (2) positive screen (n = 4,325), and (3) clinician-diagnosed depressive disorder with 18 or more weeks of enrollment (n = 2,160). RESULTS Overall, 17.3% (4,325/25,000) of patients screened positive for depression. Of positive screens, 56.1% (2,426/4,325) had clinician-diagnosed depressive disorder. Of those enrolled for 18 or more weeks, 64.8% were started on measurement- based pharmacotherapy and 8.9% referred externally. Of the 1,400 patients started on pharmacotherapy, 45.5%, 30.2%, 12.6%, and 11.6% had 0, 1, 2, and 3 or more follow-up visits, respectively. Remission rates were 20.3% (86/423), 31.6% (56/177), and 41.7% (68/163) for those with 1, 2, and 3 or more follow-up visits, respectively. Baseline characteristics associated with higher attrition were: non-white, positive drug-abuse screen, lower depression/anxiety symptom severity, and younger age. CONCLUSION Although remission rates are high in those with 3 or more followup visits after routine screening and treatment of depression, attrition from care is a significant issue adversely affecting outcomes.
KW - Antidepressants
KW - Depression
KW - Health care delivery/HSR
KW - Loss to follow-up
KW - Major depressive disorder
KW - Measurement-based care
KW - Primary care issues
KW - Primary health care
KW - Quality improvement
KW - Quality of care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069291545&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1370/afm.2418
DO - 10.1370/afm.2418
M3 - Article
C2 - 31285210
AN - SCOPUS:85069291545
SN - 1544-1709
VL - 17
SP - 326
EP - 335
JO - Annals of Family Medicine
JF - Annals of Family Medicine
IS - 4
ER -