TY - JOUR
T1 - A simple approach to risk stratification in adult heart transplantation
AU - Anyanwu, Ani C.
AU - Rogers, Chris A.
AU - Murday, Andrew J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was carried out for the UK Cardiothoracic Transplant Audit Steering Group, members of which are listed in Appendix A. The work was funded by the Department of Health. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily of the Department of Health. We thank the centre data co-ordinators, Sharon Beer, Yvonne Davenport, Jane Harte, Andrea Husain, Ian Martin, Lindsay Reynolds, Sheilagh Vidler, Bruce Whitehead and Neil Wrightson for providing us with data. Data collection and processing was done in conjunction with the United Kingdom Transplant Service Support Authority.
PY - 1999/10/1
Y1 - 1999/10/1
N2 - Objective: While there are numerous reports in the literature of risk factors for graft failure after heart transplantation, simple models for risk stratification are lacking. This study describes a simple method for risk stratification in adult heart transplantation that can be applied when the size of a dataset is insufficient for formal regression modelling. Methods: Multi-centre prospective cohort study. Fourteen risk factors documented in the literature as increasing post transplant graft failure were used to formulate a model. Risk factors included in the model were recipient age >50 years, pre-operative ventilatory support, pre-operative circulatory support, >1 previous sternotomy, pulmonary vascular resistance >2.5 wood units, male with body surface area >2.5 m2, retransplant, ischaemic time >3.5 h, donor age >45 years, donor inotropic support >10 μg/kg per min dopamine, female donor, ratio donor/recipient body surface area <0.7, donor with diabetes and history of donor drug abuse. Four risk groups were defined depending on the number of risk factors present: Low, none; moderate, 1; high, 2 or 3; very high, 4 or more. Graft survival to 30 days was chosen as the primary outcome. The model was tested on 373 adult transplants performed in the UK between April 1995 and December 1996. Results: Twenty eight transplants were low risk, 82 moderate, 201 high and 62 very high. The 30-day survival (70% CI) for the risk groups was low, 97% (93-100), moderate 95% (92-98), high 87% (84-89) and very high 80% (75-83) (P=0.02). Conclusions: This preliminary model enables some stratification of heart transplant procedures according to donor and recipient risk profile. Further work will be directed at refining and validating the model. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V.
AB - Objective: While there are numerous reports in the literature of risk factors for graft failure after heart transplantation, simple models for risk stratification are lacking. This study describes a simple method for risk stratification in adult heart transplantation that can be applied when the size of a dataset is insufficient for formal regression modelling. Methods: Multi-centre prospective cohort study. Fourteen risk factors documented in the literature as increasing post transplant graft failure were used to formulate a model. Risk factors included in the model were recipient age >50 years, pre-operative ventilatory support, pre-operative circulatory support, >1 previous sternotomy, pulmonary vascular resistance >2.5 wood units, male with body surface area >2.5 m2, retransplant, ischaemic time >3.5 h, donor age >45 years, donor inotropic support >10 μg/kg per min dopamine, female donor, ratio donor/recipient body surface area <0.7, donor with diabetes and history of donor drug abuse. Four risk groups were defined depending on the number of risk factors present: Low, none; moderate, 1; high, 2 or 3; very high, 4 or more. Graft survival to 30 days was chosen as the primary outcome. The model was tested on 373 adult transplants performed in the UK between April 1995 and December 1996. Results: Twenty eight transplants were low risk, 82 moderate, 201 high and 62 very high. The 30-day survival (70% CI) for the risk groups was low, 97% (93-100), moderate 95% (92-98), high 87% (84-89) and very high 80% (75-83) (P=0.02). Conclusions: This preliminary model enables some stratification of heart transplant procedures according to donor and recipient risk profile. Further work will be directed at refining and validating the model. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V.
KW - Heart transplantation
KW - Predictive modelling
KW - Risk factors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032883378&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00238-9
DO - 10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00238-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 10571089
AN - SCOPUS:0032883378
SN - 1010-7940
VL - 16
SP - 424
EP - 428
JO - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
JF - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
IS - 4
ER -