TY - JOUR
T1 - A review of the safety, efficacy, and administration of hedgehog inhibitors for the treatment of advanced basal cell carcinoma
T2 - an expert consensus panel
AU - Shah, Milaan
AU - Debusk, Lauren
AU - Rosenberg, Angela
AU - Burshtein, Joshua
AU - Zakria, Danny
AU - Dany, Mohammed
AU - Dinehart, Scott
AU - Lebwohl, Mark
AU - Lewin, Jesse
AU - Monks, George
AU - Mortazie, Michael
AU - Schlesinger, Todd
AU - Trotter, Shannon
AU - Rigel, Darrell
PY - 2025/9/8
Y1 - 2025/9/8
N2 - BACKGROUND: Hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs) are approved for the treatment of locally advanced BCCs in patients who are not surgical candidates or have had recurrence following surgical treatment. This expert consensus panel further characterizes the efficacy and safety of HHIs while also providing clinical guidance on their appropriate dosing, laboratory monitoring, and supplementation. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was completed on November 1, 2024 using the keywords "basal cell carcinoma," "hedgehog inhibitor," "sonidegib," and "vismodegib". An expert panel of nine dermatologists reviewed and assigned levels of evidence to the relevant articles and created consensus statements regarding HHIs, with correlating strength of recommendations, using the modified Delphi process. RESULTS: Of the 304 articles identified, 23 articles met the selection criteria and were included for review. The panel unanimously adopted nine consensus statements and recommendations, of which three were given a strength of recommendation of "A", two were given a "B", and four were given a "C". CONCLUSION: Sonidegib and vismodegib have similar efficacy in treating advanced BCC, but sonidegib has lower rates and a greater delay in onset of AEs. Sonidegib has a significantly greater volume of distribution and half-life than those of vismodegib. Dosing interruptions have not been shown to reduce the efficacy of HHIs, and L-carnitine supplementation can help reduce the incidence of muscle spasms.
AB - BACKGROUND: Hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs) are approved for the treatment of locally advanced BCCs in patients who are not surgical candidates or have had recurrence following surgical treatment. This expert consensus panel further characterizes the efficacy and safety of HHIs while also providing clinical guidance on their appropriate dosing, laboratory monitoring, and supplementation. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was completed on November 1, 2024 using the keywords "basal cell carcinoma," "hedgehog inhibitor," "sonidegib," and "vismodegib". An expert panel of nine dermatologists reviewed and assigned levels of evidence to the relevant articles and created consensus statements regarding HHIs, with correlating strength of recommendations, using the modified Delphi process. RESULTS: Of the 304 articles identified, 23 articles met the selection criteria and were included for review. The panel unanimously adopted nine consensus statements and recommendations, of which three were given a strength of recommendation of "A", two were given a "B", and four were given a "C". CONCLUSION: Sonidegib and vismodegib have similar efficacy in treating advanced BCC, but sonidegib has lower rates and a greater delay in onset of AEs. Sonidegib has a significantly greater volume of distribution and half-life than those of vismodegib. Dosing interruptions have not been shown to reduce the efficacy of HHIs, and L-carnitine supplementation can help reduce the incidence of muscle spasms.
KW - Skin cancer
KW - basal cell carcinoma
KW - expert consensus
KW - hedgehog inhibitors
KW - sonidegib
KW - treatment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020652188
U2 - 10.25251/s3cn8t86
DO - 10.25251/s3cn8t86
M3 - Review article
C2 - 41171810
AN - SCOPUS:105020652188
SN - 1087-2108
VL - 31
JO - Dermatology Online Journal
JF - Dermatology Online Journal
IS - 4
ER -