A prospective analysis of laboratory tests and imaging studies to detect hepatic lesions

M. M. Kemeny, P. H. Sugarbaker, T. J. Smith, B. K. Edwards, T. Shawker, M. Vermess, A. E. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

53 Scopus citations


A prospective study of the ability of laboratory tests and liver imaging tests to detect hepatic metastases was performed. Eighty patients at risk for hepatic metastases but without clinical evidence of disease were tested with 13 laboratory tests and three liver imaging tests. No single laboratory test had greater than 65% accuracy in the detection of hepatic lesions. No combination of the laboratory tests increased this accuracy. If the laboratory tests were used with one of the liver imaging tests, the accuracy was improved in some combinations to 76%. The CEA assay when analyzed in patients with colorectal primaries had an accuracy of 79%. The results show that the laboratory tests alone are not sufficiently accuracy to detect liver metastases. Additional accuracy can be obtained by the combined use of a single liver imaging test and selected laboratory tests. Use of all the liver imaging tests and laboratory tests lowers the accuracy and increases the expense and thus is unnecessary.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-167
Number of pages5
JournalUnknown Journal
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1982
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'A prospective analysis of laboratory tests and imaging studies to detect hepatic lesions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this