TY - JOUR
T1 - A cross-sectional analysis of compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction in maternal–fetal medicine physicians in the United States
AU - Naert, Mackenzie N.
AU - Pruitt, Cassandra
AU - Sarosi, Alex
AU - Berkin, Jill
AU - Stone, Joanne
AU - Weintraub, Andrea S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - BACKGROUND: Compassion fatigue is secondary traumatic distress experienced by providers from ongoing contact with patients who are suffering. Compassion satisfaction is emotional fulfillment from caring for others. Burnout is distress related to dissonance between job demands and available resources. Although burnout is well-studied, compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue are neglected components of physician well-being. Because of recurrent exposure to adverse outcomes, maternal–fetal medicine providers may be at particular risk for compassion fatigue. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to better characterize both clinical and nonclinical drivers of work-related distress vs satisfaction. STUDY DESIGN: The modified Compassion Fatigue and Satisfaction Self-Test and a questionnaire of professional and personal characteristics were distributed electronically to maternal–fetal medicine providers nationally. Multivariable regression models were constructed for compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction as a function of potential predictors. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 24% (n=366), primarily consisting of White physicians working in academic medical centers. Significant predictors of lower burnout scores included employment at 1 institution for >20 years, discussing work-related distress with friends, and having one's most recent involvement in decision-making for a periviable fetus >6 months ago; distress because of coworkers and personal factors predicted higher scores. Female sex, self-report of significant emotional depletion, use of mental health services, and having other maternal–fetal medicine physicians as part of the care team for a fetus with severe anomalies were significant predictors of higher compassion fatigue scores, whereas White race and having social work as part of the care team for a maternal mortality predicted lower scores. Personal spiritual practice was a significant predictor of higher compassion satisfaction score, whereas employment at current institution for <5 years predicted lower scores. CONCLUSION: Compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction, and burnout are associated with several modifiable risk factors, such as practice type, having a multidisciplinary team, and emotional support outside of the workplace; these are potential targets for intervention.
AB - BACKGROUND: Compassion fatigue is secondary traumatic distress experienced by providers from ongoing contact with patients who are suffering. Compassion satisfaction is emotional fulfillment from caring for others. Burnout is distress related to dissonance between job demands and available resources. Although burnout is well-studied, compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue are neglected components of physician well-being. Because of recurrent exposure to adverse outcomes, maternal–fetal medicine providers may be at particular risk for compassion fatigue. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to better characterize both clinical and nonclinical drivers of work-related distress vs satisfaction. STUDY DESIGN: The modified Compassion Fatigue and Satisfaction Self-Test and a questionnaire of professional and personal characteristics were distributed electronically to maternal–fetal medicine providers nationally. Multivariable regression models were constructed for compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction as a function of potential predictors. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 24% (n=366), primarily consisting of White physicians working in academic medical centers. Significant predictors of lower burnout scores included employment at 1 institution for >20 years, discussing work-related distress with friends, and having one's most recent involvement in decision-making for a periviable fetus >6 months ago; distress because of coworkers and personal factors predicted higher scores. Female sex, self-report of significant emotional depletion, use of mental health services, and having other maternal–fetal medicine physicians as part of the care team for a fetus with severe anomalies were significant predictors of higher compassion fatigue scores, whereas White race and having social work as part of the care team for a maternal mortality predicted lower scores. Personal spiritual practice was a significant predictor of higher compassion satisfaction score, whereas employment at current institution for <5 years predicted lower scores. CONCLUSION: Compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction, and burnout are associated with several modifiable risk factors, such as practice type, having a multidisciplinary team, and emotional support outside of the workplace; these are potential targets for intervention.
KW - burnout
KW - compassion fatigue
KW - compassion satisfaction
KW - maternal-fetal medicine
KW - secondary traumatic stress
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161267648&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100989
DO - 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100989
M3 - Article
C2 - 37127208
AN - SCOPUS:85161267648
SN - 2589-9333
VL - 5
JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology MFM
JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology MFM
IS - 7
M1 - 100989
ER -