TY - JOUR
T1 - A Comprehensive Lifestyle Peer Group–Based Intervention on Cardiovascular Risk Factors
T2 - The Randomized Controlled Fifty-Fifty Program
AU - Gómez-Pardo, Emilia
AU - Fernández-Alvira, Juan Miguel
AU - Vilanova, Marta
AU - Haro, Domingo
AU - Martínez, Ramona
AU - Carvajal, Isabel
AU - Carral, Vanesa
AU - Rodríguez, Carla
AU - de Miguel, Mercedes
AU - Bodega, Patricia
AU - Santos-Beneit, Gloria
AU - Peñalvo, Jose Luis
AU - Marina, Iñaki
AU - Pérez-Farinós, Napoleón
AU - Dal Re, Marian
AU - Villar, Carmen
AU - Robledo, Teresa
AU - Vedanthan, Rajesh
AU - Bansilal, Sameer
AU - Fuster, Valentin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2016/2/9
Y1 - 2016/2/9
N2 - Background Cardiovascular diseases stem from modifiable risk factors. Peer support is a proven strategy for many chronic illnesses. Randomized trials assessing the efficacy of this strategy for global cardiovascular risk factor modification are lacking. Objectives This study assessed the hypothesis that a peer group strategy would help improve healthy behaviors in individuals with cardiovascular risk factors. Methods A total of 543 adults 25 to 50 years of age with at least 1 risk factor were recruited; risk factors included hypertension (20%), overweight (82%), smoking (31%), and physical inactivity (81%). Subjects were randomized 1:1 to a peer group–based intervention group (IG) or a self-management control group (CG) for 12 months. Peer-elected leaders moderated monthly meetings involving role-play, brainstorming, and activities to address emotions, diet, and exercise. The primary outcome was mean change in a composite score related to blood pressure, exercise, weight, alimentation, and tobacco (Fuster-BEWAT score, 0 to 15). Multilevel models with municipality as a cluster variable were applied to assess differences between groups. Results Participants’ mean age was 42 ± 6 years, 71% were female, and they had a mean baseline Fuster-BEWAT score of 8.42 ± 2.35. After 1 year, the mean scores were significantly higher in the IG (n = 277) than in the CG (n = 266) (IG mean score: 8.84; 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.37 to 9.32; CG mean score: 8.17; 95% CI: 7.55 to 8.79; p = 0.02). The increase in the overall score was significantly larger in the IG compared with the CG (difference: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.32 to 1.18; p = 0.02). The mean improvement in the individual components was uniformly greater in the IG, with a significant difference for the tobacco component. Conclusions The peer group intervention had beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk factors, with significant improvements in the overall score and specifically on tobacco cessation. A follow-up assessment will be performed 1 year after the final assessment reported here to determine long-term sustainability of the improvements associated with peer group intervention.
AB - Background Cardiovascular diseases stem from modifiable risk factors. Peer support is a proven strategy for many chronic illnesses. Randomized trials assessing the efficacy of this strategy for global cardiovascular risk factor modification are lacking. Objectives This study assessed the hypothesis that a peer group strategy would help improve healthy behaviors in individuals with cardiovascular risk factors. Methods A total of 543 adults 25 to 50 years of age with at least 1 risk factor were recruited; risk factors included hypertension (20%), overweight (82%), smoking (31%), and physical inactivity (81%). Subjects were randomized 1:1 to a peer group–based intervention group (IG) or a self-management control group (CG) for 12 months. Peer-elected leaders moderated monthly meetings involving role-play, brainstorming, and activities to address emotions, diet, and exercise. The primary outcome was mean change in a composite score related to blood pressure, exercise, weight, alimentation, and tobacco (Fuster-BEWAT score, 0 to 15). Multilevel models with municipality as a cluster variable were applied to assess differences between groups. Results Participants’ mean age was 42 ± 6 years, 71% were female, and they had a mean baseline Fuster-BEWAT score of 8.42 ± 2.35. After 1 year, the mean scores were significantly higher in the IG (n = 277) than in the CG (n = 266) (IG mean score: 8.84; 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.37 to 9.32; CG mean score: 8.17; 95% CI: 7.55 to 8.79; p = 0.02). The increase in the overall score was significantly larger in the IG compared with the CG (difference: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.32 to 1.18; p = 0.02). The mean improvement in the individual components was uniformly greater in the IG, with a significant difference for the tobacco component. Conclusions The peer group intervention had beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk factors, with significant improvements in the overall score and specifically on tobacco cessation. A follow-up assessment will be performed 1 year after the final assessment reported here to determine long-term sustainability of the improvements associated with peer group intervention.
KW - cardiovascular risk
KW - healthy lifestyle
KW - motivation
KW - peer education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973481558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.033
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.033
M3 - Article
C2 - 26562047
AN - SCOPUS:84973481558
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 67
SP - 476
EP - 485
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 5
ER -