TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison of indocyanine green fluorescence and laparoscopic ultrasound for detection of liver tumors
AU - Kose, Emin
AU - Kahramangil, Bora
AU - Aydin, Husnu
AU - Donmez, Mustafa
AU - Takahashi, Hideo
AU - Acevedo-Moreno, Lou Anne
AU - Sasaki, Kazunari
AU - Aucejo, Federico
AU - Berber, Eren
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - Background: Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI) has been suggested for intraoperative identification of liver tumors. We aim to compare the intraoperative diagnostic utility of this imaging modality with laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS). Methods: This is an IRB-approved prospective study. ICG was administered intravenously 1–2 days before surgery. The findings on ICG-FI were compared to those on preoperative cross-sectional imaging (POCSI), LUS, diagnostic laparoscopy (DL). Results: A total of 144 lesions (62 superficial [visible on DL] and 82 deep) were detected in the study patients. POCSI identified 74%, LUS identified 92%, and ICG-FI identified 43%. ICG-FI detection rate was higher for superficial (95%) versus deep lesions (4%). 3% (4/144) of all lesions were seen only on ICG-FI. However, all of these lesions were small and superficial lesions that were apparent on DL. Conclusion: Although ICG-FI allowed detection of small superficial lesions that were not identifiable by POCSI or LUS, these lesions were apparent on DL even before ICG-FI. Therefore, its utility as an intraoperative diagnostic modality is limited at the dosage and timing used in the study. We believe that rather than a diagnostic tool, it has more potential for a dynamic use in guiding the resection of superficial lesions and delineating segmental/lobar anatomy.
AB - Background: Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI) has been suggested for intraoperative identification of liver tumors. We aim to compare the intraoperative diagnostic utility of this imaging modality with laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS). Methods: This is an IRB-approved prospective study. ICG was administered intravenously 1–2 days before surgery. The findings on ICG-FI were compared to those on preoperative cross-sectional imaging (POCSI), LUS, diagnostic laparoscopy (DL). Results: A total of 144 lesions (62 superficial [visible on DL] and 82 deep) were detected in the study patients. POCSI identified 74%, LUS identified 92%, and ICG-FI identified 43%. ICG-FI detection rate was higher for superficial (95%) versus deep lesions (4%). 3% (4/144) of all lesions were seen only on ICG-FI. However, all of these lesions were small and superficial lesions that were apparent on DL. Conclusion: Although ICG-FI allowed detection of small superficial lesions that were not identifiable by POCSI or LUS, these lesions were apparent on DL even before ICG-FI. Therefore, its utility as an intraoperative diagnostic modality is limited at the dosage and timing used in the study. We believe that rather than a diagnostic tool, it has more potential for a dynamic use in guiding the resection of superficial lesions and delineating segmental/lobar anatomy.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85073988913
U2 - 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.10.005
DO - 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.10.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 31653594
AN - SCOPUS:85073988913
SN - 1365-182X
VL - 22
SP - 764
EP - 769
JO - HPB
JF - HPB
IS - 5
ER -