A comparison of conventional and CT myelography using iopamidol

Frank Suslavich; Burton P. Drayer; Susan Allen; Milton Bates; Philip J. Dubois; E. Ralph Heinz; Dennis S. Osborne

doi:10.1097/00004424-198409001-00029

A comparison of conventional and CT myelography using iopamidol

Frank Suslavich
, Burton P. Drayer
, Susan Allen
, Milton Bates
, Philip J. Dubois
, E. Ralph Heinz
, Dennis S. Osborne

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The intrathecal administration of iopamidol, a nonionic, hydrosoluble, iodinated contrast medium, provided excellent anatomic detail in conventional and computed tomography (CT) myelogra- phic studies. CT myelography provided more significant diagnostic information than the conventional examination in 3 of 18 patients. Adverse reactions related to iopamidol occurred in 7 of 18 patients, were always mild, never lasted longer than 12 hours, and were never referable to the central nervous system.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	S275-S280
Journal	Investigative Radiology
Volume	19
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-198409001-00029
State	Published - 1984
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Computed tomography
Contrast media
Iopamidol
Myelography
Spine

Access to Document

10.1097/00004424-198409001-00029

Cite this

@article{b6e3c23d1c18473eb410a290171d01e4,

title = "A comparison of conventional and CT myelography using iopamidol",

abstract = "The intrathecal administration of iopamidol, a nonionic, hydrosoluble, iodinated contrast medium, provided excellent anatomic detail in conventional and computed tomography (CT) myelogra- phic studies. CT myelography provided more significant diagnostic information than the conventional examination in 3 of 18 patients. Adverse reactions related to iopamidol occurred in 7 of 18 patients, were always mild, never lasted longer than 12 hours, and were never referable to the central nervous system.",

keywords = "Computed tomography, Contrast media, Iopamidol, Myelography, Spine",

author = "Frank Suslavich and Drayer, \{Burton P.\} and Susan Allen and Milton Bates and Dubois, \{Philip J.\} and Heinz, \{E. Ralph\} and Osborne, \{Dennis S.\}",

year = "1984",

doi = "10.1097/00004424-198409001-00029",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

pages = "S275--S280",

journal = "Investigative Radiology",

issn = "0020-9996",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of conventional and CT myelography using iopamidol

AU - Suslavich, Frank

AU - Drayer, Burton P.

AU - Allen, Susan

AU - Bates, Milton

AU - Dubois, Philip J.

AU - Heinz, E. Ralph

AU - Osborne, Dennis S.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - The intrathecal administration of iopamidol, a nonionic, hydrosoluble, iodinated contrast medium, provided excellent anatomic detail in conventional and computed tomography (CT) myelogra- phic studies. CT myelography provided more significant diagnostic information than the conventional examination in 3 of 18 patients. Adverse reactions related to iopamidol occurred in 7 of 18 patients, were always mild, never lasted longer than 12 hours, and were never referable to the central nervous system.

AB - The intrathecal administration of iopamidol, a nonionic, hydrosoluble, iodinated contrast medium, provided excellent anatomic detail in conventional and computed tomography (CT) myelogra- phic studies. CT myelography provided more significant diagnostic information than the conventional examination in 3 of 18 patients. Adverse reactions related to iopamidol occurred in 7 of 18 patients, were always mild, never lasted longer than 12 hours, and were never referable to the central nervous system.

KW - Computed tomography

KW - Contrast media

KW - Iopamidol

KW - Myelography

KW - Spine

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0021178618

U2 - 10.1097/00004424-198409001-00029

DO - 10.1097/00004424-198409001-00029

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0021178618

SN - 0020-9996

VL - 19

SP - S275-S280

JO - Investigative Radiology

JF - Investigative Radiology

IS - 5

ER -

A comparison of conventional and CT myelography using iopamidol

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this