TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison between two types of visually-evoked nystagmus in the monkey
AU - Pasik, Pedro
AU - Pasik, Tauba
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge with thanks the participation of Dr Jose A. Valciukas in most of the original studies on which this report is based. The work was supported in part by N.I.M.H. Grant no. MH-02261 of the U.S. Public Health Service.
PY - 1975
Y1 - 1975
N2 - Similarities between optokinetic nystagmus (O.K.N.) and flicker-induced nystagmus (F.I.N.) include: response buildup and occurrence during the entire period of stimulation; absence of habituation; after-nystagmus in the same direction; occasional after-after-nystagmus to the opposite side; frequency spectrum, peak frequency and existence of lower and upper frequency thresholds. Phenomena are different in that for O.K.N. the stimulus is in motion; binocular and monocular stimulation are effective; direction is determined by direction of motion; unidirectionality is absent; there is minimal influence of background illumination, posture, labyrinthine receptors, and section of crossed optic fibers. For F.I.N. the stimulus is stationary; the response is elicited only by monocular stimulation; the direction is determined by the stimulated eye; there is exclusive unidirectionality; it is abolished by background illumination, optic chiasm section and bilateral labyrinthectomy; it is strongly influenced by posture. This comparison suggests that O.K.N. and F.I.N. are separate responses and that the effective stimulus for F.I.N. may activate selectively the crossed optic fibers.
AB - Similarities between optokinetic nystagmus (O.K.N.) and flicker-induced nystagmus (F.I.N.) include: response buildup and occurrence during the entire period of stimulation; absence of habituation; after-nystagmus in the same direction; occasional after-after-nystagmus to the opposite side; frequency spectrum, peak frequency and existence of lower and upper frequency thresholds. Phenomena are different in that for O.K.N. the stimulus is in motion; binocular and monocular stimulation are effective; direction is determined by direction of motion; unidirectionality is absent; there is minimal influence of background illumination, posture, labyrinthine receptors, and section of crossed optic fibers. For F.I.N. the stimulus is stationary; the response is elicited only by monocular stimulation; the direction is determined by the stimulated eye; there is exclusive unidirectionality; it is abolished by background illumination, optic chiasm section and bilateral labyrinthectomy; it is strongly influenced by posture. This comparison suggests that O.K.N. and F.I.N. are separate responses and that the effective stimulus for F.I.N. may activate selectively the crossed optic fibers.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0016627366
U2 - 10.3109/00016487509121273
DO - 10.3109/00016487509121273
M3 - Article
C2 - 811079
AN - SCOPUS:0016627366
SN - 0001-6489
VL - 79
SP - 30
EP - 37
JO - Acta Oto-Laryngologica
JF - Acta Oto-Laryngologica
IS - S330
ER -