Abstract
Sixteen patients with cervical cancer underwent radical surgery following standard clinical staging, MRI, and CT. The sensitivity of the CT scan was 14%, the specificity 100%. MRI had a sensitivity of 28% and a specificity of 64%. The clinical stage was correct in 10 of 16 patients (62%). CT and MRI are not individually or collectively better than clinical staging in predicting extent of disease, and currently should not be included in the FIGO staging for cervix cancer.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 409-412 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Gynecologic Oncology |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1990 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative study of computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and clinical staging for the detection of early cervix cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver