TY - JOUR
T1 - 18F-fluoride PET/MR in cardiac amyloid
T2 - A comparison study with aortic stenosis and age- and sex-matched controls
AU - Andrews, Jack P.M.
AU - Trivieri, Maria Giovanni
AU - Everett, Russell
AU - Spath, Nicholas
AU - MacNaught, Gillian
AU - Moss, Alastair J.
AU - Doris, Mhairi K.
AU - Pawade, Tania
AU - van Beek, Edwin J.R.
AU - Lucatelli, Christophe
AU - Newby, David E.
AU - Robson, Philip
AU - Fayad, Zahi A.
AU - Dweck, Marc R.
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge the support of Siemens Healthineers in the use of the Radial Selfgating MR Works-In-Progress package. This sequence is based on contributions from Simon Bauer, Robert Grimm, and Matthias Fenchel. The authors would also like to acknowledge the team of Radiographers and PET Physicists within Queens Medical Research Institute Imaging Facility with special thanks to Mr David Brian, Mr Ken Dolan, and Dr Tim Clark. None of the authors disclose any competing interests.
Funding Information:
JPMA is supported by BHF Clinical Research Training Fellowship no. FS/17/51/33096. MGT is supported by the National Institutes of Health grant 5T32HL007824-18 and KL2 TR001435. PMR and ZAF are supported by National Institutes of Health grant (R01 HL071021). DEN (CH/09/002, RE/18/5/34216) is supported by the British Heart Foundation and a Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator Award (WT103782AIA). MRD is supported by the Sir Jules Thorn Biomedical Research Award 2015 (15/JTA) and by the British Heart Foundation (FS/14/78/31020). The Edinburgh Imaging is supported by the National Health Service Research Scotland (NRS) through National Health Service Lothian Health Board.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Objectives: Cardiac MR is widely used to diagnose cardiac amyloid, but cannot differentiate AL and ATTR subtypes: an important distinction given their differing treatments and prognoses. We used PET/MR imaging to quantify myocardial uptake of 18F-fluoride in ATTR and AL amyloid patients, as well as participants with aortic stenosis and age/sex-matched controls. Methods: In this prospective multicenter study, patients were recruited in Edinburgh and New York and underwent 18F-fluoride PET/MR imaging. Standardized volumes of interest were drawn in the septum and areas of late gadolinium enhancement to derive myocardial standardized uptake values (SUV) and tissue-to-background ratio (TBRMEAN) after correction for blood pool activity in the right atrium. Results: 53 patients were scanned: 18 with cardiac amyloid (10 ATTR and 8 AL), 13 controls, and 22 with aortic stenosis. No differences in myocardial TBR values were observed between participants scanned in Edinburgh and New York. Mean myocardial TBRMEAN values in ATTR amyloid (1.13 ± 0.16) were higher than controls (0.84 ± 0.11, P =.0006), aortic stenosis (0.73 ± 0.12, P <.0001), and those with AL amyloid (0.96 ± 0.08, P =.01). TBRMEAN values within areas of late gadolinium enhancement provided discrimination between patients with ATTR (1.36 ± 0.23) and all other groups (e.g., AL [1.06 ± 0.07, P =.003]). A TBRMEAN threshold >1.14 in areas of LGE demonstrated 100% sensitivity (CI 72.25 to 100%) and 100% specificity (CI 67.56 to 100%) for ATTR compared to AL amyloid (AUC 1, P =.0004). Conclusion: Quantitative 18F-fluoride PET/MR imaging can distinguish ATTR amyloid from other similar phenotypes and holds promise in improving the diagnosis of this condition.
AB - Objectives: Cardiac MR is widely used to diagnose cardiac amyloid, but cannot differentiate AL and ATTR subtypes: an important distinction given their differing treatments and prognoses. We used PET/MR imaging to quantify myocardial uptake of 18F-fluoride in ATTR and AL amyloid patients, as well as participants with aortic stenosis and age/sex-matched controls. Methods: In this prospective multicenter study, patients were recruited in Edinburgh and New York and underwent 18F-fluoride PET/MR imaging. Standardized volumes of interest were drawn in the septum and areas of late gadolinium enhancement to derive myocardial standardized uptake values (SUV) and tissue-to-background ratio (TBRMEAN) after correction for blood pool activity in the right atrium. Results: 53 patients were scanned: 18 with cardiac amyloid (10 ATTR and 8 AL), 13 controls, and 22 with aortic stenosis. No differences in myocardial TBR values were observed between participants scanned in Edinburgh and New York. Mean myocardial TBRMEAN values in ATTR amyloid (1.13 ± 0.16) were higher than controls (0.84 ± 0.11, P =.0006), aortic stenosis (0.73 ± 0.12, P <.0001), and those with AL amyloid (0.96 ± 0.08, P =.01). TBRMEAN values within areas of late gadolinium enhancement provided discrimination between patients with ATTR (1.36 ± 0.23) and all other groups (e.g., AL [1.06 ± 0.07, P =.003]). A TBRMEAN threshold >1.14 in areas of LGE demonstrated 100% sensitivity (CI 72.25 to 100%) and 100% specificity (CI 67.56 to 100%) for ATTR compared to AL amyloid (AUC 1, P =.0004). Conclusion: Quantitative 18F-fluoride PET/MR imaging can distinguish ATTR amyloid from other similar phenotypes and holds promise in improving the diagnosis of this condition.
KW - 18F-fluoride
KW - Amyloid
KW - Aortic stenosis
KW - CMR
KW - PET
KW - PET/MR
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091803514&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12350-020-02356-1
DO - 10.1007/s12350-020-02356-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 33000405
AN - SCOPUS:85091803514
VL - 29
SP - 741
EP - 749
JO - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
JF - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
SN - 1071-3581
IS - 2
ER -